Escobedo
E857262
Escobedo is the shorthand name for the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Escobedo v. Illinois, which significantly expanded the right to counsel during police interrogations.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Escobedo canonical | 2 |
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark criminal procedure case ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Escobedo case
ⓘ
Escobedo decision NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| citation |
12 L. Ed. 2d 977
ⓘ
378 U.S. 478 ⓘ 84 S. Ct. 1758 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1964-06-22 ⓘ |
| decisionType | 5–4 decision ⓘ |
| dissentingJustices |
Byron R. White
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Hugo L. Black NERFINISHED ⓘ John M. Harlan II NERFINISHED ⓘ Potter Stewart NERFINISHED ⓘ Tom C. Clark NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| effect |
expanded the right to counsel during police interrogations
ⓘ
limited the admissibility of confessions obtained without access to counsel ⓘ |
| followedBy | Miranda v. Arizona NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasFullName | Escobedo v. Illinois NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
A suspect has a Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogation once the investigation focuses on the suspect and the suspect requests an attorney.
ⓘ
Statements elicited by police during interrogation after a suspect has requested and been denied counsel are inadmissible at trial. ⓘ |
| issue |
admissibility of incriminating statements obtained without counsel
ⓘ
right to counsel during police interrogation ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| keyword |
exclusionary rule
ⓘ
police interrogation ⓘ right to counsel ⓘ self-incrimination ⓘ |
| languageOfProceeding | English ⓘ |
| legalArea |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal procedure ⓘ |
| majorityJustices |
Abe Fortas
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Arthur J. Goldberg NERFINISHED ⓘ Earl Warren NERFINISHED ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ William O. Douglas NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Justice Arthur J. Goldberg NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| petitioner | Danny Escobedo NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precededBy | Gideon v. Wainwright NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondent | State of Illinois NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| shortName | Escobedo NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1964 ⓘ |
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.