Georgia v. McCollum
E821204
Georgia v. McCollum is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that criminal defendants, like prosecutors, may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Georgia v. McCollum canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9799069 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia v. McCollum Context triple: [Batson v. Kentucky, laterExtendedBy, Georgia v. McCollum]
-
A.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a school voucher program, ruling that public funds could be used for tuition at religious schools without violating the Establishment Clause.
-
C.
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Wisconsin v. Yoder is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that held compulsory school attendance laws could not be applied in a way that violated Amish parents’ religious freedom.
-
D.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited student First Amendment rights by allowing public school officials greater authority to regulate school-sponsored student speech, such as in school newspapers.
-
E.
Abington School District v. Schempp
Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Georgia v. McCollum Target entity description: Georgia v. McCollum is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that criminal defendants, like prosecutors, may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.
-
A.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a school voucher program, ruling that public funds could be used for tuition at religious schools without violating the Establishment Clause.
-
C.
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Wisconsin v. Yoder is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that held compulsory school attendance laws could not be applied in a way that violated Amish parents’ religious freedom.
-
D.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited student First Amendment rights by allowing public school officials greater authority to regulate school-sponsored student speech, such as in school newspapers.
-
E.
Abington School District v. Schempp
Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
criminal procedure case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ criminal law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1992-02-26 ⓘ |
| citation | 505 U.S. 42 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Sandra Day O’Connor NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision | Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedDate | 1992-06-18 ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1992-06-18 ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
Antonin Scalia
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED ⓘ William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 91-372 ⓘ |
| effect | Prohibits race-based peremptory strikes by criminal defendants in state and federal courts. ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Georgia v. McCollum NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
Criminal defendants may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.
ⓘ
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits race-based peremptory challenges by criminal defendants. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Anthony M. Kennedy
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
David H. Souter NERFINISHED ⓘ John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED ⓘ Sandra Day O’Connor NERFINISHED ⓘ Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| legalPrinciple | Extension of Batson v. Kentucky to criminal defendants ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| page | 42 ⓘ |
| party |
McCollum
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
State of Georgia NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| priorHistory | McCollum v. State, 261 Ga. 473, 405 S.E.2d 688 (1991) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| rearguedDate | 1992-04-22 ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Batson v. Kentucky
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. NERFINISHED ⓘ Powers v. Ohio NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
jury selection
ⓘ
peremptory challenges ⓘ racial discrimination in jury selection ⓘ |
| volume | 505 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1992 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Georgia v. McCollum Description of subject: Georgia v. McCollum is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that criminal defendants, like prosecutors, may not use peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.