Attorney General v Blake
E728345
Attorney General v Blake is a landmark English contract law case that established the exceptional remedy of allowing the state to claim a defendant’s profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Attorney General v Blake canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8338873 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Attorney General v Blake Context triple: [Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, notableWork, Attorney General v Blake]
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
C.
Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada
Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada is a landmark 1979 Supreme Court of Canada decision that upheld a federal unemployment insurance scheme denying benefits to pregnant women, highlighting early limitations in Canadian equality rights protections.
-
D.
Engblom v. Carey
Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
-
E.
Blakely v. Washington
Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Attorney General v Blake Target entity description: Attorney General v Blake is a landmark English contract law case that established the exceptional remedy of allowing the state to claim a defendant’s profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate.
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
C.
Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada
Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada is a landmark 1979 Supreme Court of Canada decision that upheld a federal unemployment insurance scheme denying benefits to pregnant women, highlighting early limitations in Canadian equality rights protections.
-
D.
Engblom v. Carey
Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
-
E.
Blakely v. Washington
Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
English contract law case
ⓘ
House of Lords decision ⓘ landmark case ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
contracts involving public interest and national security
ⓘ
exceptional cases involving breach of contract ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
contract law
ⓘ
public law ⓘ restitution ⓘ |
| category |
English unjust enrichment case law
ⓘ
House of Lords cases ⓘ United Kingdom contract case law ⓘ |
| citation |
[2000] UKHL 45
ⓘ
[2001] 1 AC 268 ⓘ |
| court | House of Lords NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionYear | 2000 ⓘ |
| defendantRole | former British spy ⓘ |
| distinguishedFrom |
ordinary expectation damages
ⓘ
reliance damages ⓘ |
| factsSummary |
Blake, a former British intelligence officer, breached a lifelong confidentiality agreement by publishing a book about his activities
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
The Crown sought to recover royalties from Blake’s book as profits from his breach of contract ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Regina v John Griffiths Blake (Attorney General intervening) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | England and Wales NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
In exceptional circumstances, the Crown may obtain an account of profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate
ⓘ
The Attorney General was entitled to claim Blake’s profits from publication of his book in breach of his contractual undertaking of confidentiality ⓘ |
| influenced | development of gain-based remedies in English contract law ⓘ |
| judge |
Lord Browne-Wilkinson
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Hutton NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead NERFINISHED ⓘ Lord Steyn NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdictionInfluence | Common law jurisdictions outside England and Wales ⓘ |
| leadingJudgmentBy | Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalPrinciple |
account of profits for breach of contract
ⓘ
disgorgement damages for breach of contract ⓘ |
| legalTest | whether the plaintiff has a legitimate interest in preventing the defendant’s profit-making activity and in depriving him of his profit ⓘ |
| party |
Attorney General
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
John Griffiths Blake NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| remedyCharacterisation | exceptional ⓘ |
| remedyCondition |
claimant must have a legitimate interest in preventing the defendant’s profit-making activity
ⓘ
ordinary damages must be inadequate ⓘ |
| remedyRecognised |
account of profits
ⓘ
disgorgement of profits ⓘ |
| shortName | AG v Blake NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
breach of confidentiality undertaking
ⓘ
publication of memoirs by former intelligence officer ⓘ |
| topic |
gain-based remedies
ⓘ
relationship between contract and restitution ⓘ remedies for breach of contract ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Attorney General v Blake Description of subject: Attorney General v Blake is a landmark English contract law case that established the exceptional remedy of allowing the state to claim a defendant’s profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.