Triple
T28842099
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Attorney General v Blake |
E728345
|
entity |
| Predicate | remedyRecognised |
P13744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | account of profits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: account of profits | Statement: [Attorney General v Blake, remedyRecognised, account of profits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: remedyRecognised Context triple: [Attorney General v Blake, remedyRecognised, account of profits]
-
A.
remedy
Indicates that one entity serves to cure, alleviate, or counteract a problem, illness, or undesirable condition affecting another entity.
-
B.
hasRemedy
Indicates that one entity serves as a remedy, treatment, or corrective measure for a problem, condition, or undesirable state associated with another entity.
-
C.
remedyPower
Indicates that one entity has the capacity or effectiveness to cure, alleviate, or counteract the negative effects associated with another entity.
-
D.
typeOfRemedy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of remedy in relation to another entity.
-
E.
remedySought
Indicates that a particular legal or corrective action is being requested as a solution or relief in response to a problem or dispute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0319e8e7c8190b37288c8845b9dbc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 4:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6597388608190b0bcb812f4484f62 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65762b5e481908a30ca963dcba4be |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:41 a.m.