Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Attorney General v Blake | Statement: [Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, notableWork, Attorney General v Blake]

Target entity: Attorney General v Blake
Context triple: [Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, notableWork, Attorney General v Blake]

• A. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• B. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
  R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
• C. Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada
  Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada is a landmark 1979 Supreme Court of Canada decision that upheld a federal unemployment insurance scheme denying benefits to pregnant women, highlighting early limitations in Canadian equality rights protections.
• D. Engblom v. Carey
  Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
• E. Blakely v. Washington
  Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Attorney General v Blake
Triple: [Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, notableWork, Attorney General v Blake]

Attorney General v Blake is a landmark English contract law case that established the exceptional remedy of allowing the state to claim a defendant’s profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate.

Target entity: Attorney General v Blake
Target entity description: Attorney General v Blake is a landmark English contract law case that established the exceptional remedy of allowing the state to claim a defendant’s profits for breach of contract where ordinary damages are inadequate.

• A. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• B. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
  R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
• C. Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada
  Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada is a landmark 1979 Supreme Court of Canada decision that upheld a federal unemployment insurance scheme denying benefits to pregnant women, highlighting early limitations in Canadian equality rights protections.
• D. Engblom v. Carey
  Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
• E. Blakely v. Washington
  Blakely v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Apprendi rule to state sentencing guidelines, holding that any fact increasing a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
• F. None of above. chosen