Keyes v. School District No. 1

E710181

Keyes v. School District No. 1 is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended school desegregation principles to northern and western districts by recognizing de facto segregation as unconstitutional when caused by intentional discriminatory actions.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Keyes v. School District No. 1 canonical 1

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark school desegregation case
areaOfLaw civil rights law
constitutional law
education law
arguedDate October 12, 1972
citation 413 U.S. 189
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate June 21, 1973
dissentBy Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. NERFINISHED
Justice William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
docketNumber No. 71-507
factPattern challenged racially segregated schools in Denver allegedly created by school board policies such as gerrymandered attendance zones and school site selection
fullName Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado NERFINISHED
geographicScope northern United States school districts
western United States school districts
holding A finding of intentional segregation in a meaningful portion of a school system creates a presumption that segregation in the entire system is unlawful
De facto segregation caused by intentional discriminatory actions by school authorities violates the Equal Protection Clause
Once intentional segregation is shown in a substantial part of a district, the burden shifts to the school authorities to prove that other segregation is not also the result of intentional discrimination
joinedByInMajority Chief Justice Warren E. Burger NERFINISHED
Justice Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Justice Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED
Justice Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
Justice Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
Justice William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
languageOfProceedings English
legalIssue Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED
school desegregation
locationOfDispute Denver, Colorado NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
petitioner Wilfred Keyes NERFINISHED
relatedCase Brown v. Board of Education NERFINISHED
Milliken v. Bradley NERFINISHED
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education NERFINISHED
relatedConstitutionalProvision Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
relatedDoctrine Equal protection
de facto segregation
de jure segregation
remedyType school desegregation orders
respondent School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado NERFINISHED
significance established a framework for proving systemwide intentional segregation in urban school districts
extended school desegregation principles beyond the South
recognized that intentional actions by school boards creating or maintaining racial segregation are unconstitutional even without explicit segregation statutes
subsequentImpact clarified evidentiary burdens in proving intentional school segregation
influenced later litigation over urban school desegregation outside the South
timePeriod 1970s

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education relatedTo Keyes v. School District No. 1