Powell v. McCormack

E557778

Powell v. McCormack is a landmark 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power to exclude a duly elected member, holding that it could not refuse to seat Adam Clayton Powell Jr. when he met all constitutional qualifications.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (50)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark case
areaOfLaw election law
federal courts
legislative powers
arguedDate 1968-11-18
1968-11-19
chiefJusticeAtDecision Earl Warren NERFINISHED
citation 395 U.S. 486
concurrenceBy Abe Fortas NERFINISHED
Byron White NERFINISHED
Hugo Black NERFINISHED
John Marshall Harlan II NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Article I, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution
Article I, Section 5, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1969-06-16
defendant John W. McCormack NERFINISHED
defendantOffice Speaker of the United States House of Representatives NERFINISHED
dissentBy Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
distinctionDrawn difference between exclusion and expulsion of a member of Congress
effect limited Congress’s power to refuse to seat duly elected members who meet constitutional qualifications
holding Congress may not exclude a duly elected member who meets the Constitution’s standing qualifications for membership in the House of Representatives
The House of Representatives may judge only the qualifications expressly set forth in the Constitution for its members
The House of Representatives may not add to the constitutional qualifications for membership by excluding a member-elect
issue justiciability of disputes over congressional membership
scope of congressional power to exclude a member-elect
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction
legalDoctrine case or controversy requirement
political question doctrine
separation of powers
majorityOpinionBy Earl Warren NERFINISHED
originatingBody United States House of Representatives NERFINISHED
page 486
plaintiff Adam Clayton Powell Jr. NERFINISHED
rearguedDate 1969-03-10
1969-03-11
relatedTo expulsion of members of Congress
qualifications for membership in the United States House of Representatives
reporter United States Reports
subjectOf United States constitutional law
term Warren Court NERFINISHED
volume 395
vote 7–1
yearDecided 1969

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Adam Clayton Powell Jr. legalCase Powell v. McCormack
political question doctrine leadingCase Powell v. McCormack