Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

E545526

Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan is a 1965 Indian Supreme Court case that examined the scope of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution, particularly fundamental rights, under Article 368.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Indian Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
fundamental rights case
areaOfLaw basic structure of the Constitution (preliminary discussion)
constitutional amendments
fundamental rights
benchType Constitution Bench NERFINISHED
challengedAmendment Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of India NERFINISHED
Seventeenth Constitutional Amendment Act, 1964 NERFINISHED
chiefJusticeOnBench P. B. Gajendragadkar NERFINISHED
citation (1965) 1 SCR 933
AIR 1965 SC 845
concernedWith amendability of fundamental rights
amendment of the Constitution of India
scope of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution
country India
courtLocation New Delhi NERFINISHED
decisionYear 1965
effectOnDoctrine reaffirmed Shankari Prasad on Parliament’s amending power
followedBy I. C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) NERFINISHED
heldThat Parliament has power under Article 368 to amend any part of the Constitution NERFINISHED
constitutional amendments are not ‘law’ within the meaning of Article 13
influenced development of the basic structure doctrine in India
judgeOnBench J. R. Mudholkar NERFINISHED
M. Hidayatullah NERFINISHED
P. B. Gajendragadkar NERFINISHED
R. S. Bachawat NERFINISHED
V. Ramaswami NERFINISHED
jurisdiction Supreme Court of India NERFINISHED
languageOfProceedings English
legalProvisionInIssue Article 13 of the Constitution of India
Article 368 of the Constitution of India NERFINISHED
fundamental rights provisions of the Constitution of India
legalSystem common law
notedFor early articulation of limits on amending power in separate opinions
numberOfJudges 5
petitioner Sajjan Singh NERFINISHED
relatedTo I. C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab NERFINISHED
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala NERFINISHED
Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India NERFINISHED
respondent State of Rajasthan NERFINISHED
separateOpinionBy J. R. Mudholkar NERFINISHED
M. Hidayatullah NERFINISHED

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Article 368 subjectOf Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan