Triple
T22076156
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan |
E545526
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalProvisionInIssue |
P24624
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Article 368 of the Constitution of India |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Article 368 of the Constitution of India | Statement: [Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, legalProvisionInIssue, Article 368 of the Constitution of India]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Article 368 of the Constitution of India Context triple: [Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, legalProvisionInIssue, Article 368 of the Constitution of India]
-
A.
Article 368 of the Constitution of India
chosen
Article 368 of the Constitution of India is the provision that lays down the procedure and scope for amending the Constitution, defining how and to what extent Parliament can alter its provisions.
-
B.
Article 342 of the Constitution of India
Article 342 of the Constitution of India is the provision that empowers the President to specify the Scheduled Tribes in relation to each state or union territory, subject to parliamentary amendment.
-
C.
Article 341 of the Constitution of India
Article 341 of the Constitution of India is the provision that empowers the President to specify and notify which castes are to be recognized as Scheduled Castes in different states and union territories.
-
D.
Article 365 of the Constitution of India
Article 365 of the Constitution of India empowers the Union government to treat a state's failure to comply with or give effect to Union directions as a ground for concluding that the state's constitutional machinery has broken down, thereby facilitating the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356.
-
E.
Article 338 of the Constitution of India
Article 338 of the Constitution of India establishes a national commission tasked with safeguarding the rights and interests of the Scheduled Castes through investigation, monitoring, and advisory functions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalProvisionInIssue Context triple: [Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, legalProvisionInIssue, Article 368 of the Constitution of India]
-
A.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
B.
legalContent
Indicates that the associated material complies with applicable laws and regulations and is permitted for use, distribution, or display.
-
C.
legalDetail
chosen
Indicates that there is specific legal information, conditions, or attributes associated with the related entity or relationship.
-
D.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
E.
legalRequirement
Indicates that one entity is obligated by law to perform, provide, or comply with something in relation to another entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3523488190badd54b5d580c00d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f128b2bf60819082d38e671f160b0f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f64a6a70819089d1a6c3a2384861 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:28 p.m.