Illinois v. Wardlow

E522185

Illinois v. Wardlow is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an individual's unprovoked flight in a high-crime area can contribute to reasonable suspicion justifying a stop under the Fourth Amendment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
areaOfLaw United States constitutional law
criminal procedure in the United States
arguedDate November 2, 1999
citation 528 U.S. 119
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate January 12, 2000
dissentingOpinionBy Justice John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
docketNumber No. 98-1036
factPatternElement defendant fled upon seeing a caravan of police vehicles
officers discovered a handgun during the stop
officers pursued and stopped the defendant
fullName Illinois v. Wardlow NERFINISHED
geographicContext high-crime area in Chicago, Illinois
holding Presence in a high-crime area, combined with unprovoked flight, may create reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop
Unprovoked flight upon noticing the police in a high-crime area can contribute to reasonable suspicion justifying a stop under the Fourth Amendment
impact expanded circumstances under which police may conduct Terry stops based on flight in high-crime areas
joinedDissent Justice David H. Souter NERFINISHED
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg NERFINISHED
Justice Stephen G. Breyer in part
joinedMajority Justice Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Justice Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
Justice Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
Justice John Paul Stevens in part
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor NERFINISHED
Justice Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
legalIssue Fourth Amendment NERFINISHED
Terry stop
reasonable suspicion
majorityOpinionBy Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
originatingCourt Illinois state courts NERFINISHED
page 119
petitioner State of Illinois NERFINISHED
precedentialStatus binding precedent on federal and state courts regarding reasonable suspicion
relatedCase California v. Hodari D. NERFINISHED
Florida v. Royer NERFINISHED
Terry v. Ohio NERFINISHED
reporter United States Reports
respondent Sam Wardlow NERFINISHED
result Judgment of the Illinois Appellate Court reversed
standardApplied reasonable suspicion standard under Terry v. Ohio
subjectMatter police investigatory stops
search and seizure
stop and frisk
volume 528

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Terry v. Ohio subsequentCitationBy Illinois v. Wardlow