Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: California v. Hodari D. | Statement: [Illinois v. Wardlow, relatedCase, California v. Hodari D.]

Target entity: California v. Hodari D.
Context triple: [Illinois v. Wardlow, relatedCase, California v. Hodari D.]

• A. Hurtado v. California
  Hurtado v. California is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause does not require states to use grand jury indictments in criminal prosecutions.
• B. Illinois v. Caballes
  Illinois v. Caballes is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case holding that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment when it does not prolong the stop or reveal information other than the presence of contraband.
• C. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• D. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• E. Riley v. California
  Riley v. California is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: California v. Hodari D.
Target entity description: California v. Hodari D. is a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed the definition of a "seizure" under the Fourth Amendment by holding that a suspect is not seized until physically restrained or submits to a show of police authority.

• A. Hurtado v. California
  Hurtado v. California is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause does not require states to use grand jury indictments in criminal prosecutions.
• B. Illinois v. Caballes
  Illinois v. Caballes is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case holding that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment when it does not prolong the stop or reveal information other than the presence of contraband.
• C. Hurd v. Hodge
  Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• D. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• E. Riley v. California
  Riley v. California is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
• F. None of above. chosen