Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors

E479821

U.S. Supreme Court case United States constitutional law case legal case

Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label	Occurrences
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors canonical	1

Statements (36)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ United States constitutional law case ⓘ legal case ⓘ
areaOfLaw	interstate compacts ⓘ regulation of interstate banking ⓘ
citation	472 U.S. 159 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted	Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ Compact Clause of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ
country	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
court	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate	1985 ⓘ
decisionType	majority opinion ⓘ
firstPage	159 ⓘ
fullName	Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System NERFINISHED ⓘ
holding	regional interstate banking arrangements at issue did not constitute an unconstitutional interstate compact under the Compact Clause ⓘ state regional banking statutes at issue were not preempted by federal banking law ⓘ
impact	clarified when interstate arrangements among states require congressional consent under the Compact Clause ⓘ confirmed that certain regional banking reciprocity statutes are compatible with federal banking regulation ⓘ
issue	whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ whether regional interstate banking compacts conflicted with federal banking statutes ⓘ
jurisdiction	federal question jurisdiction ⓘ
legalSubject	Compact Clause NERFINISHED ⓘ banking law ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ federal preemption ⓘ interstate banking ⓘ
petitioner	Northeast Bancorp, Inc. NERFINISHED ⓘ
precedentFor	cases involving state regulation of interstate banking consistent with federal law ⓘ cases involving the scope of the Compact Clause ⓘ
relatedTo	regional banking compacts among New England states ⓘ state statutes authorizing reciprocal interstate bank acquisitions within a region ⓘ
reporter	United States Reports ⓘ
respondent	Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System NERFINISHED ⓘ
result	state regional banking statutes were upheld ⓘ
timePeriod	20th century ⓘ
volume	472 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.

Instruction

You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10.

# Requirements
- If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list.
- If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list.
- Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf".
- Do not get too wordy.
- Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.

Input

Subject: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
Description of subject: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Compact Clause of the United States Constitution → appliedInCase → Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors ⓘ