Windsor

E393170

Windsor is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a key part of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Windsor canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf LGBT rights case
U.S. Supreme Court case
civil rights case
constitutional law case
landmark case
areaOfLaw LGBT rights in the United States
family law
federalism
argumentDate 2013-03-27
challengedProvision Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act
challengedStatute Defense of Marriage Act
citation 133 S. Ct. 2675
186 L. Ed. 2d 808
570 U.S. 744
constitutionalProvision Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States of America
decisionDate 2013-06-26
decisionType 5–4 decision
defendant United States of America
dissentingJustice Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas
John G. Roberts Jr.
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
docketNumber 12-307
effect extended federal benefits to married same-sex couples
required federal government to recognize same-sex marriages valid under state law
struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act
hasJurisdiction Supreme Court of the United States
holding Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons protected by the Fifth Amendment
joinedMajorityJustice Elena Kagan
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Sonia Sotomayor
Stephen G. Breyer
legalIssue due process under the Fifth Amendment
equal protection under the Fifth Amendment
federal recognition of same-sex marriages
locationOfLowerCourtCase United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
lowerCourt United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
lowerCourtOutcome DOMA Section 3 held unconstitutional
majorityOpinionBy Anthony M. Kennedy
petitioner United States of America
surface form: United States
plaintiff Edith Schlain Windsor
surface form: Edith Windsor
precedentFor Obergefell v. Hodges
relatedCase Hollingsworth v. Perry
relatedLegislation Defense of Marriage Act
respondent Edith Schlain Windsor
surface form: Edith Windsor
result federal definition of marriage could not exclude same-sex couples where states recognized such marriages
subjectMatter estate tax refund for surviving same-sex spouse
term October Term 2012

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.