Rule 403

E354853

Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States evidentiary rule
legal rule
procedural rule
rule of evidence
appliesStage pretrial motions in limine
trial objections
appliesTo civil cases
criminal cases
evidentiary rulings
otherwise relevant evidence
trial proceedings
citationForm Rule 403 self-linksurface differs
surface form: Fed. R. Evid. 403
codifiedIn Rule 403 self-linksurface differs
surface form: Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403
discretion trial court discretion
doesNotRequire exclusion of all prejudicial evidence
focusesOn unfair prejudice rather than mere prejudice
governs admissibility of relevant evidence
influenced state rules of evidence
jurisdiction U.S. federal courts
surface form: United States federal courts
keyConcept confusing the issues
misleading the jury
needless presentation of cumulative evidence
probative value
undue delay
unfair prejudice
waste of time
legalDomain civil procedure
criminal procedure
evidence law
legalTestType balancing test
partOf rules of evidence for the federal courts
surface form: Federal Rules of Evidence
policyBasis balancing truth-seeking against fairness and efficiency
primaryFunction exclusion of relevant evidence in certain circumstances
purpose to enhance efficiency of judicial proceedings
to prevent jury decision-making based on improper considerations
to promote fairness in trials
relatedConcept Rule 401
Rule 402
Rule 404
surface form: Rule 404(b)
requiresBalancing probative value versus risk of confusing the issues
probative value versus risk of misleading the jury
probative value versus risk of needlessly presenting cumulative evidence
probative value versus risk of undue delay
probative value versus risk of unfair prejudice
probative value versus risk of wasting time
reviewStandard abuse of discretion
standard probative value substantially outweighed by countervailing dangers
usedBy judges
litigators

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (5)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Rule 403 codifiedIn Rule 403 self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403
Rule 403 citationForm Rule 403 self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Fed. R. Evid. 403
Rule 609 relatedTo Rule 403
this entity surface form: Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence