Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403 | Statement: [Rule 403, codifiedIn, Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403]

Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403
Context triple: [Rule 403, codifiedIn, Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403]

• A. Rule 403 chosen
  Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
• B. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1003 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that permits the use of duplicates in place of original writings, recordings, or photographs unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or it would be unfair to admit the duplicate.
• C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
• D. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
  Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
• E. Federal Rule of Evidence 806
  Federal Rule of Evidence 806 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that governs how and when a hearsay declarant’s credibility may be attacked or supported as if the declarant had testified in court.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.