Triple

T14311985
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rule 403 E354853 entity
Predicate relatedConcept P37 FINISHED
Object Rule 402
Rule 402 is a provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that establishes the general principle that only relevant evidence is admissible in court.
E1091414 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule 402 | Statement: [Rule 403, relatedConcept, Rule 402]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule 402
Context triple: [Rule 403, relatedConcept, Rule 402]
  • A. Rule 404
    Rule 404 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove they acted in conformity with that character on a particular occasion, subject to limited exceptions.
  • B. Rule 405
    Rule 405 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the methods by which a party may prove a person’s character when character is admissible as evidence in a case.
  • C. Rule 44
    Rule 44 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs the right to and appointment of counsel for defendants in federal criminal cases, including issues of joint representation and potential conflicts of interest.
  • D. Rule 403
    Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
  • E. Rule 414
    Rule 414 is a provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s prior child molestation offenses in criminal cases involving similar charges.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Rule 402
Triple: [Rule 403, relatedConcept, Rule 402]
Generated description
Rule 402 is a provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that establishes the general principle that only relevant evidence is admissible in court.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule 402
Target entity description: Rule 402 is a provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that establishes the general principle that only relevant evidence is admissible in court.
  • A. Rule 404
    Rule 404 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove they acted in conformity with that character on a particular occasion, subject to limited exceptions.
  • B. Rule 405
    Rule 405 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the methods by which a party may prove a person’s character when character is admissible as evidence in a case.
  • C. Rule 44
    Rule 44 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs the right to and appointment of counsel for defendants in federal criminal cases, including issues of joint representation and potential conflicts of interest.
  • D. Rule 403
    Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
  • E. Rule 414
    Rule 414 is a provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence that governs the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s prior child molestation offenses in criminal cases involving similar charges.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 completed April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fd3d3124488190b2ea35949294e297 completed May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69fd3ded77748190b35908e046ccce67 completed May 8, 2026, 1:35 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69fd3e7425348190abf09c103cc17305 completed May 8, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.