Kleppe v. New Mexico

E262091

Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Kleppe v. New Mexico canonical 4

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
federal court case
arguedDate 1976-03-01
citation 426 U.S. 529
49 L. Ed. 2d 34
96 S. Ct. 2285
concurrenceBy William O. Douglas
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Property Clause
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1976-06-17
docketNumber 74-1484
holding United States public land law
surface form: Congress has complete power over public lands under the Property Clause

Congress may regulate and protect wildlife living on federal lands
federal power over public lands is superior to conflicting state laws
United States public land law
surface form: the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act is a valid exercise of Congress’s Property Clause power
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White
Harry A. Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Potter Stewart
Warren E. Burger
William H. Rehnquist
William J. Brennan Jr.
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
languageOfProceeding English
legalIssue constitutionality of the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971
federal authority over public lands
federal authority over wildlife on public lands
scope of federal power under the Property Clause
lowerCourt United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
majorityOpinionBy Thurgood Marshall
petitioner Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior
relatedStatute Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution
surface form: U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (Property Clause)

Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971
respondent New Mexico
surface form: State of New Mexico
result judgment of the lower court reversed
significance landmark case on the breadth of federal authority over public lands
often cited for the proposition that Congress’s power over federal lands is plenary
subjectMatter management of wild free-roaming horses and burros on federal lands
topic environmental law
federalism
public lands law
wildlife management
yearDecided 1976

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.