Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo
E1041725
Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T13442861 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo Context triple: [New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence, includesCase, Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo]
-
A.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
-
B.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Payton v. New York
Payton v. New York is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits police from making warrantless, nonconsensual entries into a suspect’s home to make a routine felony arrest.
-
E.
New York v. United States (1992)
New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo Target entity description: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.
-
A.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
-
B.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Payton v. New York
Payton v. New York is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits police from making warrantless, nonconsensual entries into a suspect’s home to make a routine felony arrest.
-
E.
New York v. United States (1992)
New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ labor law case ⓘ landmark Supreme Court decision ⓘ |
| affectedGroup | women workers in New York ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (1936) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
economic regulation ⓘ labor and employment law ⓘ |
| citation | 298 U.S. 587 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvoked | Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | June 1, 1936 ⓘ |
| dissentingJustice |
Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Harlan F. Stone NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Louis D. Brandeis NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| era | Lochner era NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| fullName | Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalContext | New Deal era NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance |
exemplified the Supreme Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal
ⓘ
one of the last major Lochner-era decisions striking down labor regulation ⓘ |
| holding |
New York’s minimum wage law for women violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
the state could not fix minimum wages for adult women without violating freedom of contract ⓘ |
| impact |
contributed to political pressure for changes in Supreme Court jurisprudence on economic regulation
ⓘ
its reasoning was rejected the following year in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish ⓘ |
| joinedByMajorityJustice |
Justice George Sutherland
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice James Clark McReynolds NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Pierce Butler NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Willis Van Devanter NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| laterOverruledBy | West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| lawStruckDown | New York minimum wage law for women NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of minimum wage regulation
ⓘ
freedom of contract ⓘ substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Justice Owen J. Roberts NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFollowed | Adkins v. Children’s Hospital NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedAmendment | Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lochner v. New York NERFINISHED ⓘ West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine | Lochner era substantive due process NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| stateLawInvolved | New York NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| topic |
minimum wage
ⓘ
police power of the states ⓘ |
| vote | 5–4 decision ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1936 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo Description of subject: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.