Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo

E1041725

Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
labor law case
landmark Supreme Court decision
affectedGroup women workers in New York
alsoKnownAs Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (1936) NERFINISHED
areaOfLaw constitutional law
economic regulation
labor and employment law
citation 298 U.S. 587
constitutionalProvisionInvoked Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate June 1, 1936
dissentingJustice Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes NERFINISHED
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo NERFINISHED
Justice Harlan F. Stone NERFINISHED
Justice Louis D. Brandeis NERFINISHED
era Lochner era NERFINISHED
fullName Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo NERFINISHED
historicalContext New Deal era NERFINISHED
historicalSignificance exemplified the Supreme Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal
one of the last major Lochner-era decisions striking down labor regulation
holding New York’s minimum wage law for women violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
the state could not fix minimum wages for adult women without violating freedom of contract
impact contributed to political pressure for changes in Supreme Court jurisprudence on economic regulation
its reasoning was rejected the following year in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
joinedByMajorityJustice Justice George Sutherland NERFINISHED
Justice James Clark McReynolds NERFINISHED
Justice Pierce Butler NERFINISHED
Justice Willis Van Devanter NERFINISHED
laterOverruledBy West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED
lawStruckDown New York minimum wage law for women NERFINISHED
legalIssue constitutionality of minimum wage regulation
freedom of contract
substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment
majorityOpinionBy Justice Owen J. Roberts NERFINISHED
precedentFollowed Adkins v. Children’s Hospital NERFINISHED
relatedAmendment Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
relatedCase Adkins v. Children’s Hospital NERFINISHED
Lochner v. New York NERFINISHED
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED
relatedDoctrine Lochner era substantive due process NERFINISHED
stateLawInvolved New York NERFINISHED
topic minimum wage
police power of the states
vote 5–4 decision
yearDecided 1936

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence includesCase Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo