Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo
E1041725
Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ labor law case ⓘ landmark Supreme Court decision ⓘ |
| affectedGroup | women workers in New York ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo, 298 U.S. 587 (1936) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
economic regulation ⓘ labor and employment law ⓘ |
| citation | 298 U.S. 587 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvoked | Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | June 1, 1936 ⓘ |
| dissentingJustice |
Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Harlan F. Stone NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Louis D. Brandeis NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| era | Lochner era NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| fullName | Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalContext | New Deal era NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance |
exemplified the Supreme Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal
ⓘ
one of the last major Lochner-era decisions striking down labor regulation ⓘ |
| holding |
New York’s minimum wage law for women violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
the state could not fix minimum wages for adult women without violating freedom of contract ⓘ |
| impact |
contributed to political pressure for changes in Supreme Court jurisprudence on economic regulation
ⓘ
its reasoning was rejected the following year in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish ⓘ |
| joinedByMajorityJustice |
Justice George Sutherland
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Justice James Clark McReynolds NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Pierce Butler NERFINISHED ⓘ Justice Willis Van Devanter NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| laterOverruledBy | West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| lawStruckDown | New York minimum wage law for women NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of minimum wage regulation
ⓘ
freedom of contract ⓘ substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Justice Owen J. Roberts NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFollowed | Adkins v. Children’s Hospital NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedAmendment | Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Adkins v. Children’s Hospital
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lochner v. New York NERFINISHED ⓘ West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine | Lochner era substantive due process NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| stateLawInvolved | New York NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| topic |
minimum wage
ⓘ
police power of the states ⓘ |
| vote | 5–4 decision ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1936 ⓘ |
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.