Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo | Statement: [New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence, includesCase, Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo]

Target entity: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo
Context triple: [New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence, includesCase, Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo]

• A. Nebbia v. New York
  Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
• B. Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
• C. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• D. Payton v. New York
  Payton v. New York is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits police from making warrantless, nonconsensual entries into a suspect’s home to make a routine felony arrest.
• E. New York v. United States (1992)
  New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo
Triple: [New Deal era Supreme Court jurisprudence, includesCase, Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo]

Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.

Target entity: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo
Target entity description: Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, exemplifying the Court’s conservative resistance to economic regulation during the New Deal era.

• A. Nebbia v. New York
  Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
• B. Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
• C. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• D. Payton v. New York
  Payton v. New York is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits police from making warrantless, nonconsensual entries into a suspect’s home to make a routine felony arrest.
• E. New York v. United States (1992)
  New York v. United States (1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel states to enact or enforce federal regulatory programs, reinforcing the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
• F. None of above. chosen