constitutionalBasisOfHolding
P33112
predicate
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
All labels observed (5)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Engblom v. CareyHolding | 2 |
| GorsuchConcurrenceBasis | 1 |
| ThomasConcurrenceBasis | 1 |
| constitutionalBasisOfHolding canonical | 1 |
| heldConstitutionalIn | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: constitutionalBasisOfHolding
Generated description
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
Sample triples (6)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Colorado Department of State v. Baca | Electors have a federal constitutional right to exercise discretion in casting their Electoral College votes ⓘ |
| Third Amendment to the United States Constitution |
Army National Guard
via predicate surface "Engblom v. CareyHolding"
ⓘ
surface form:
National Guard troops are soldiers for Third Amendment purposes
|
| Third Amendment to the United States Constitution | Third Amendment can apply to state actions via incorporation via predicate surface "Engblom v. CareyHolding" ⓘ |
| Timbs v. Indiana |
Privileges and Immunities Clause
via predicate surface "ThomasConcurrenceBasis"
ⓘ
surface form:
Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
|
| Timbs v. Indiana | Agreement with incorporation of Excessive Fines Clause via predicate surface "GorsuchConcurrenceBasis" ⓘ |
| Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act |
South Carolina v. Katzenbach
via predicate surface "heldConstitutionalIn"
ⓘ
surface form:
South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1966)
|