usesLegalPrecedentFrom
P129583
predicate
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or argument relies on, cites, or is based upon the legal precedent established by another.
All labels observed (6)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| followsCaseLaw | 2 |
| reinforcesCaseLaw | 2 |
| usesLegalPrecedentFrom canonical | 2 |
| citedAsPrecedentFor | 1 |
| followsPrecedent | 1 |
| hasPrecedentIn | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: usesLegalPrecedentFrom
Generated description
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or argument relies on, cites, or is based upon the legal precedent established by another.
Sample triples (9)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Deemster | England and Wales NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Deemster | Isle of Man courts NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hall v. Florida | Atkins v. Virginia via predicate surface "followsPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Earl of Oxford’s Case | priority of equitable remedies over inconsistent common law rights via predicate surface "citedAsPrecedentFor" ⓘ |
| United States v. California (1965) | earlier United States v. California offshore lands litigation via predicate surface "hasPrecedentIn" ⓘ |
| Internationale Handelsgesellschaft | Costa v ENEL via predicate surface "followsCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Internationale Handelsgesellschaft | Van Gend en Loos via predicate surface "followsCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Simmenthal | Costa v ENEL via predicate surface "reinforcesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Simmenthal | Internationale Handelsgesellschaft via predicate surface "reinforcesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ |