Triple
T35378479
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Internationale Handelsgesellschaft |
E1022579
|
entity |
| Predicate | followsCaseLaw |
P129583
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Costa v ENEL |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Costa v ENEL | Statement: [Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, followsCaseLaw, Costa v ENEL]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followsCaseLaw Context triple: [Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, followsCaseLaw, Costa v ENEL]
-
A.
followsLegalAuthority
Indicates that one entity acts in accordance with, or is subordinate to, the legal power, rules, or jurisdiction exercised by another entity.
-
B.
legalCodePreceded
Indicates that one legal code existed or was in force before another legal code in a temporal or historical sequence.
-
C.
usesLegalPrecedentFrom
chosen
Indicates that one legal case, decision, or argument relies on, cites, or is based upon the legal precedent established by another.
-
D.
appliesLawThrough
Indicates that one entity enforces, implements, or carries out a law or legal rule by means of another entity or mechanism.
-
E.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df28d8c819089f2c5799fe7d079 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff069ec1348190815375c5c9e38404 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff05ba57f88190a45d20f18044e0fb |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.