Earl of Oxford’s Case

E628499

Earl of Oxford’s Case is a landmark early 17th-century English legal decision that established the principle that equity prevails over common law when the two are in conflict.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (30)

Predicate Object
instanceOf English legal case
equity case
landmark case
appliesTo cases where equitable and legal rights are inconsistent
approximateDate early 17th century
areaOfLaw common law
equity
citedAsPrecedentFor priority of equitable remedies over inconsistent common law rights
conflictBetween Court of Chancery and common law courts
country England
court Court of Chancery NERFINISHED
Court of King’s Bench NERFINISHED
effect confirmed that the Chancellor could restrain enforcement of common law judgments
strengthened the authority of the Court of Chancery
historicalContext period of institutional rivalry between common law courts and Chancery
holds equity prevails over common law in case of conflict
influenced later English equity cases
subsequent doctrine on fusion of law and equity
jurisdiction England
language English
legalPrincipleEstablished supremacy of equity over common law
where common law and equity conflict, equity shall prevail
legalSystem English law
legalTradition common law tradition
recognizedBy legal historians as a landmark decision
significance foundational authority on the relationship between equity and common law
influential in the development of English equity jurisprudence
timePeriod Stuart England
topic conflict of jurisdictions
relationship between courts of law and courts of equity

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Court of Chancery notableCase Earl of Oxford’s Case