Montgomery v. Louisiana

E914622

Montgomery v. Louisiana is a landmark 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that made the ban on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles retroactive, requiring states to apply that constitutional rule to past cases.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case
United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
juvenile justice case
appliesTo juvenile offenders sentenced to mandatory life without parole
citation 136 S. Ct. 718
193 L. Ed. 2d 599
577 U.S. 190
clarifies that substantive constitutional rules apply retroactively in state collateral review proceedings
constitutionalProvision Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 2016-01-25
dissentingOpinionBy Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
Samuel A. Alito Jr. NERFINISHED
docketNumber 14-280
effectOnMiller made the rule of Miller v. Alabama retroactive to cases on state collateral review
holding Miller v. Alabama announced a substantive rule of constitutional law that is retroactive on state collateral review. NERFINISHED
Prisoners whose sentences violate Miller v. Alabama must be given a meaningful opportunity for release or a new sentence that complies with Miller.
States must give effect to the substantive rule that mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders violates the Eighth Amendment.
impact expanded resentencing and parole eligibility for individuals sentenced as juveniles to mandatory life without parole
joinedByInMajority Elena Kagan NERFINISHED
John G. Roberts Jr. NERFINISHED
Ruth Bader Ginsburg NERFINISHED
Sonia Sotomayor NERFINISHED
Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED
jurisdictionalHolding The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review state collateral proceedings to ensure states give retroactive effect to substantive federal rules. NERFINISHED
legalIssue Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments
juvenile life without parole
retroactivity of new constitutional rules on state collateral review
majorityOpinionBy Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
originatingJurisdiction State of Louisiana NERFINISHED
petitioner Henry Montgomery NERFINISHED
precedentStatus landmark decision
relatedCase Miller v. Alabama NERFINISHED
Penry v. Lynaugh NERFINISHED
Schriro v. Summerlin NERFINISHED
Teague v. Lane NERFINISHED
requires states to provide a meaningful opportunity for release to juvenile offenders whose mandatory life without parole sentences are unconstitutional under Miller
respondent Louisiana NERFINISHED
ruleType substantive rule of constitutional law
stateParty Louisiana NERFINISHED
subjectMatter criminal sentencing
juvenile constitutional rights
postconviction review
term October Term 2015
yearDecided 2016

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Graham v. Florida relatedCase Montgomery v. Louisiana
Miller v. Alabama precedentOf Montgomery v. Louisiana
Miller v. Alabama relatedCase Montgomery v. Louisiana