Triple
T36973185
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Montgomery v. Louisiana |
E914622
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisdictionalHolding |
P6505
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review state collateral proceedings to ensure states give retroactive effect to substantive federal rules. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review state collateral proceedings to ensure states give retroactive effect to substantive federal rules. | Statement: [Montgomery v. Louisiana, jurisdictionalHolding, The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review state collateral proceedings to ensure states give retroactive effect to substantive federal rules.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisdictionalHolding Context triple: [Montgomery v. Louisiana, jurisdictionalHolding, The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review state collateral proceedings to ensure states give retroactive effect to substantive federal rules.]
-
A.
heldForJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity is being detained or kept in custody specifically for legal or jurisdictional reasons by a particular authority.
-
B.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
C.
jurisdictionBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal grounds or authority under which one entity has the right to exercise jurisdiction over another entity, action, or matter.
-
D.
hadJurisdictionType
Indicates that a governing body, authority, or legal entity possessed a specific type or scope of jurisdiction over a matter, area, or population.
-
E.
honorsJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity recognizes and respects the legal authority, rules, or governance of another jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8d13b4819089af24a47ce092fc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb34e5576881909394355c8ec6ddd2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb2f6171e88190bf1e0ee6a644b6a9 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.