Nixon v. United States

E903974

Nixon v. United States is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that held challenges to the Senate’s procedures for conducting impeachment trials are nonjusticiable political questions beyond judicial review.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (51)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
United States constitutional law case
impeachment case
legal case
arguedDate 1992-10-14
background Walter L. Nixon, Jr. was impeached and removed from office after a criminal conviction for making false statements to a grand jury NERFINISHED
category United States Supreme Court cases decided in 1993
United States impeachment case law
United States separation of powers case law
citation 506 U.S. 224
concurrenceBy Justice Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Justice David H. Souter NERFINISHED
Justice Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 of the U.S. Constitution NERFINISHED
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the U.S. Constitution NERFINISHED
Article III of the U.S. Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1993-01-13
defendantArgument The Constitution commits impeachment trials solely to the Senate and bars judicial review
docketNumber 91-740
fullName Nixon v. United States NERFINISHED
holding Challenges to the Senate’s procedures for conducting impeachment trials present nonjusticiable political questions
The federal courts lack authority to review the Senate’s impeachment trial procedures
The word "try" in the Impeachment Trial Clause does not impose judicially enforceable limits on the Senate’s conduct of impeachment trials
impact Confirmed that federal courts will not review the Senate’s conduct of impeachment trials
Frequently cited in cases and scholarship on the political question doctrine and impeachment
issue Whether the judiciary may review the Senate’s procedures in impeachment trials
legalPrinciple Senate has sole power to try impeachments
political question doctrine limits judicial review of impeachment proceedings
lowerCourt United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit NERFINISHED
lowerCourtDisposition Dismissal of Nixon’s claim affirmed
majorityOpinionBy Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
opinionType unanimous in judgment
page 224
petitioner Walter L. Nixon, Jr. NERFINISHED
plaintiffArgument The Senate’s use of a committee to receive evidence violated the constitutional requirement that the Senate "try" impeachments
proceduralHistory Nixon filed suit in federal court challenging the Senate’s impeachment trial procedures
The D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal NERFINISHED
The district court dismissed the case as a nonjusticiable political question
relatedPerson Walter L. Nixon, Jr., former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi NERFINISHED
reporter United States Reports
respondent United States NERFINISHED
result Judgment of the lower court affirmed
shortName Nixon NERFINISHED
subjectMatter impeachment
judicial review
political question doctrine
separation of powers
volume 506
year 1993

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

political question doctrine leadingCase Nixon v. United States