axiom of choice
E87367
The axiom of choice is a fundamental principle in set theory asserting that one can select an element from each set in any collection of nonempty sets, with far-reaching consequences across mathematics.
All labels observed (5)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| axiom of choice canonical | 5 |
| well-ordering theorem | 4 |
| Zorn's lemma | 2 |
| Hausdorff maximal principle | 1 |
| axiom of choice (over ZF) | 1 |
Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
mathematical principle
ⓘ
set-theoretic axiom ⓘ |
| abbreviationInZFC | the C in ZFC ⓘ |
| acceptedIn | most mainstream mathematics ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | AC ⓘ |
| appliesTo | arbitrary collections of nonempty sets ⓘ |
| centralTo | development of modern set theory ⓘ |
| consistencyRelativeTo | Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory if ZF is consistent ⓘ |
| controversialBecause |
implies counterintuitive results like Banach–Tarski paradox
ⓘ
leads to non-constructive existence proofs ⓘ |
| domainOfDiscourse | collections of nonempty sets ⓘ |
| equivalentTo |
Tychonoff theorem for products of compact spaces
ⓘ
axiom of choice self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form:
Zorn's lemma
every set can be written as a disjoint union of choice sets for a partition ⓘ every surjective function has a right inverse ⓘ every vector space has a basis ⓘ axiom of choice self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form:
well-ordering theorem
|
| expressedAs | every family of nonempty sets admits a choice function ⓘ |
| field | set theory ⓘ |
| formalizes | ability to choose an element from each set in a family of nonempty sets ⓘ |
| hasStrongerForm | global axiom of choice ⓘ |
| hasWeakerForm |
countable axiom of choice
ⓘ
dependent choice ⓘ |
| implies |
Banach–Tarski paradox
ⓘ
axiom of choice self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form:
Hausdorff maximal principle
every field has an algebraic closure ⓘ every infinite set has a countable subset ⓘ every product of nonempty sets is nonempty ⓘ every set can be well-ordered ⓘ every vector space has a Hamel basis ⓘ existence of non-measurable sets of real numbers ⓘ well-ordering of every set ⓘ |
| independenceProvedBy |
Kurt Gödel
ⓘ
Paul Cohen ⓘ |
| independentOf |
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
ⓘ
surface form:
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory without choice
|
| influences | foundations of mathematics ⓘ |
| introducedBy | Ernst Zermelo ⓘ |
| logicalType | existential axiom ⓘ |
| motivatedBy | well-ordering theorem ⓘ |
| quantifierForm | for every family F of nonempty sets there exists a function f with domain F such that f(X) is in X for all X in F ⓘ |
| rejectedIn |
constructive mathematics
ⓘ
some schools of intuitionism ⓘ |
| relatedTo | continuum hypothesis ⓘ |
| statusInZFC | axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice ⓘ |
| usedIn |
algebra
ⓘ
category theory ⓘ functional analysis ⓘ measure theory ⓘ topology ⓘ |
| yearIntroduced | 1904 ⓘ |
Referenced by (13)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
well-ordering theorem
this entity surface form:
well-ordering theorem
this entity surface form:
Zorn's lemma
this entity surface form:
well-ordering theorem
this entity surface form:
Zorn's lemma
this entity surface form:
Hausdorff maximal principle
this entity surface form:
well-ordering theorem
this entity surface form:
axiom of choice (over ZF)