Triple
T3913064
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | axiom of choice |
E87367
|
entity |
| Predicate | consistencyRelativeTo |
P28011
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory if ZF is consistent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory if ZF is consistent | Statement: [axiom of choice, consistencyRelativeTo, Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory if ZF is consistent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consistencyRelativeTo Context triple: [axiom of choice, consistencyRelativeTo, Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory if ZF is consistent]
-
A.
typicalConsistency
Indicates that one entity characteristically maintains a regular or expected level of consistency in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
consistentWith
Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
-
C.
isEquiconsistentWith
chosen
Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
-
D.
relativePosition
Indicates the spatial relationship of one entity’s location with respect to another entity’s position.
-
E.
relativeLength
Indicates a comparative relationship between entities based on how long they are relative to one another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9424514819086e9c58adde6652d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef188b474819087680db42b04ecdd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aee75eedcc81908088ff4dbb8be56b |
completed | March 9, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:22 p.m.