Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)

E851646

Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that addressed the scope of state jurisdiction in international law following a collision on the high seas.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice
international court judgment
landmark case in international law
alsoKnownAs S.S. Lotus case judgment NERFINISHED
The Lotus case NERFINISHED
applicantState France NERFINISHED
areaOfLaw jurisdiction in international law
law of the sea
public international law
bindingOn parties to the dispute (France and Turkey)
citation P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 10 NERFINISHED
consequence criminal prosecution of French officer Lieutenant Demons in Turkey
considered landmark decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice
leading case on state jurisdiction in international law
court Permanent Court of International Justice NERFINISHED
decisionDate 1927-09-07
disputeBetween France NERFINISHED
Turkey NERFINISHED
factPattern collision caused deaths of Turkish nationals
frequentlyCitedIn cases and literature on extraterritorial jurisdiction
textbooks on public international law
holding Turkey did not act in conflict with international law by instituting criminal proceedings against the French officer
influenced development of the permissive view of state jurisdiction in international law
later debates on jurisdiction in the law of the sea
scholarly concept of the "Lotus principle"
keyIssue whether Turkey could exercise criminal jurisdiction over a French officer following a collision on the high seas
languageOfJudgment French
legalQuestion whether exclusive jurisdiction belonged to the flag state of the vessel on the high seas
originatingIncident collision between French steamship Lotus and Turkish collier Boz-Kourt GENERATED
originatingIncidentLocation high seas
partyState French Republic NERFINISHED
Republic of Turkey NERFINISHED
placeOfCourt The Hague NERFINISHED
principleArticulated absence of a prohibitive rule does not equal prohibition in international law
international law leaves to states a wide measure of discretion in asserting jurisdiction
states may exercise jurisdiction unless there is a prohibitive rule of international law
relatedVessel Boz-Kourt NERFINISHED
S.S. Lotus NERFINISHED
respondentState Turkey NERFINISHED
result claims of France rejected
seriesNumber Series A No. 10 NERFINISHED
status final judgment
subjectMatter jurisdiction over incidents on the high seas
permissive nature of international law regarding state jurisdiction
scope of state criminal jurisdiction in international law
successorBody International Court of Justice (as successor to the PCIJ, not to the specific case) NERFINISHED
temporalContext interwar period
yearDecided 1927

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10 contains Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
this entity surface form: judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Lotus case