Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
E851646
decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice
international court judgment
landmark case in international law
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that addressed the scope of state jurisdiction in international law following a collision on the high seas.
Observed surface forms (1)
| Surface form | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Lotus case | 1 |
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice
ⓘ
international court judgment ⓘ landmark case in international law ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
S.S. Lotus case judgment
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
The Lotus case NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| applicantState | France NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
jurisdiction in international law
ⓘ
law of the sea ⓘ public international law ⓘ |
| bindingOn | parties to the dispute (France and Turkey) ⓘ |
| citation | P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 10 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| consequence | criminal prosecution of French officer Lieutenant Demons in Turkey ⓘ |
| considered |
landmark decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice
ⓘ
leading case on state jurisdiction in international law ⓘ |
| court | Permanent Court of International Justice NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1927-09-07 ⓘ |
| disputeBetween |
France
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Turkey NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| factPattern | collision caused deaths of Turkish nationals ⓘ |
| frequentlyCitedIn |
cases and literature on extraterritorial jurisdiction
ⓘ
textbooks on public international law ⓘ |
| holding | Turkey did not act in conflict with international law by instituting criminal proceedings against the French officer ⓘ |
| influenced |
development of the permissive view of state jurisdiction in international law
ⓘ
later debates on jurisdiction in the law of the sea ⓘ scholarly concept of the "Lotus principle" ⓘ |
| keyIssue | whether Turkey could exercise criminal jurisdiction over a French officer following a collision on the high seas ⓘ |
| languageOfJudgment | French ⓘ |
| legalQuestion | whether exclusive jurisdiction belonged to the flag state of the vessel on the high seas ⓘ |
| originatingIncident | collision between French steamship Lotus and Turkish collier Boz-Kourt GENERATED ⓘ |
| originatingIncidentLocation | high seas ⓘ |
| partyState |
French Republic
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Republic of Turkey NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| placeOfCourt | The Hague NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| principleArticulated |
absence of a prohibitive rule does not equal prohibition in international law
ⓘ
international law leaves to states a wide measure of discretion in asserting jurisdiction ⓘ states may exercise jurisdiction unless there is a prohibitive rule of international law ⓘ |
| relatedVessel |
Boz-Kourt
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
S.S. Lotus NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondentState | Turkey NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result | claims of France rejected ⓘ |
| seriesNumber | Series A No. 10 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| status | final judgment ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
jurisdiction over incidents on the high seas
ⓘ
permissive nature of international law regarding state jurisdiction ⓘ scope of state criminal jurisdiction in international law ⓘ |
| successorBody | International Court of Justice (as successor to the PCIJ, not to the specific case) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| temporalContext | interwar period ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1927 ⓘ |
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10
→
contains
→
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Lotus case
Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10
→
alternativeName
→
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
ⓘ