Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.

E666877

Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc. is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that limited immunity for efforts to influence private standard-setting bodies, refining the scope of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (32)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
antitrust case
areaOfLaw competition law
trade regulation
citation 100 L. Ed. 2d 497
108 S. Ct. 1931
486 U.S. 492
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1988
doctrineRefined Noerr-Pennington doctrine NERFINISHED
fullName Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation v. Indian Head, Incorporated NERFINISHED
holding Efforts to influence a private standard-setting body are not automatically immune from antitrust liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine
Manipulation of a private association’s standard-setting process for anticompetitive purposes can violate the Sherman Act
Noerr-Pennington immunity is limited to genuine efforts to influence governmental action NERFINISHED
impact clarified antitrust scrutiny of private associations’ standard-setting processes
narrowed the scope of Noerr-Pennington immunity
issue Whether Noerr-Pennington immunity applies to efforts to influence a private standard-setting association
Whether conduct to exclude a rival’s product from a private code can constitute an antitrust violation
jurisdiction federal
legalSubject Noerr-Pennington doctrine NERFINISHED
antitrust law
immunity for petitioning activity
private standard-setting organizations
petitioner Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation NERFINISHED
precedentFor distinction between governmental and private petitioning for Noerr-Pennington purposes
limits on antitrust immunity for private standard-setting activities
relatedStatute Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED
respondent Indian Head, Inc. NERFINISHED
subjectMatter exclusion of competing products from private codes
standard-setting in the electrical conduit industry
yearDecided 1988

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Noerr-Pennington doctrine clarifiedInCase Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.