United States v. O'Brien

E666862

United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Surface form Occurrences
Selective Draft Law Cases 1

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
landmark First Amendment case
arguedOn 1968-01-24
chiefJusticeAtDecision Earl Warren NERFINISHED
citation 391 U.S. 367
concernsProvision federal prohibition on destruction or mutilation of draft cards
concernsStatute Universal Military Training and Service Act NERFINISHED
concurrenceBy John M. Harlan II NERFINISHED
Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Free Speech Clause NERFINISHED
countryOfOrigin United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decade 1960s
decidedOn 1968-05-27
defendant David Paul O'Brien NERFINISHED
dissentBy William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
docketNumber 232
established O'Brien test NERFINISHED
fullName United States v. David Paul O'Brien NERFINISHED
holding Government regulation of symbolic speech is permissible if it meets the O'Brien test
The federal law prohibiting destruction of draft cards is constitutional as applied to O'Brien
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Hugo L. Black NERFINISHED
John M. Harlan II NERFINISHED
Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
jurisdiction United States federal law NERFINISHED
legalIssue First Amendment freedom of speech
constitutionality of draft card destruction ban
symbolic speech
majorityOpinionBy Earl Warren NERFINISHED
OBrienTestElement Governmental interest must be unrelated to the suppression of free expression
Incidental restriction on First Amendment freedoms must be no greater than essential to further that interest
Regulation must be within the constitutional power of the government
Regulation must further an important or substantial governmental interest
page 367
plaintiff United States NERFINISHED
precedentFor cases involving regulation of expressive conduct
content-neutral time, place, and manner regulations
reporter United States Reports
result O'Brien's conviction was affirmed
topic Vietnam War era draft
selective service system NERFINISHED
volume 391

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court hasNotableCase United States v. O'Brien
this entity surface form: Selective Draft Law Cases