Rita v. United States
E649385
Rita v. United States is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the reasonableness review of federal sentences under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines following United States v. Booker.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Rita v. United States canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7193354 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rita v. United States Context triple: [United States v. Booker, subsequentInterpretationBy, Rita v. United States]
-
A.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
B.
Roth v. United States
Roth v. United States is a landmark 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal standard for obscenity under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
-
D.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
E.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rita v. United States Target entity description: Rita v. United States is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the reasonableness review of federal sentences under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines following United States v. Booker.
-
A.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
B.
Roth v. United States
Roth v. United States is a landmark 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal standard for obscenity under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Printz v. United States
Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
-
D.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
E.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
criminal sentencing case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
criminal procedure
ⓘ
federal sentencing guidelines ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 2007-02-20 ⓘ |
| citation |
127 S. Ct. 2456
ⓘ
168 L. Ed. 2d 203 ⓘ 551 U.S. 338 ⓘ |
| citationStyle | Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| clarified | standard of appellate review for sentences after United States v. Booker ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Antonin Scalia
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED ⓘ John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedDate | 2007-06-21 ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2007-06-21 ⓘ |
| dissentBy | David H. Souter NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 06-5754 ⓘ |
| holding |
Courts of appeals may apply a presumption of reasonableness to a district court sentence that reflects a properly calculated Sentencing Guidelines range.
ⓘ
The presumption of reasonableness for within-Guidelines sentences is an appellate presumption, not a presumption binding the sentencing judge. ⓘ |
| involved | United States Sentencing Guidelines NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| involvedStatute | 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Anthony M. Kennedy
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
David H. Souter NERFINISHED ⓘ John G. Roberts, Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED ⓘ Ruth Bader Ginsburg NERFINISHED ⓘ Samuel A. Alito, Jr. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal criminal sentencing ⓘ |
| languageOfProceeding | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
presumption of reasonableness for within-Guidelines sentences
ⓘ
reasonableness review of federal sentences ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| originatingCourt | United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| petitioner | Victor A. Rita NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| postBookerCase | true ⓘ |
| precedentFor | appellate review of within-Guidelines sentences ⓘ |
| relatedTo | United States v. Booker NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondent | United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result | sentence affirmed ⓘ |
| term | October Term 2006 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Rita v. United States Description of subject: Rita v. United States is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the reasonableness review of federal sentences under the advisory Sentencing Guidelines following United States v. Booker.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.