Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
E522189
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of state "stop and identify" laws requiring suspects to disclose their names during lawful Terry stops.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5478393 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Context triple: [Terry v. Ohio, subsequentCitationBy, Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada]
-
A.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
B.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
-
C.
Oregon v. Mitchell
Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.
-
D.
Virginia v. Black
Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
-
E.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Target entity description: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of state "stop and identify" laws requiring suspects to disclose their names during lawful Terry stops.
-
A.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
B.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
-
C.
Oregon v. Mitchell
Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.
-
D.
Virginia v. Black
Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
-
E.
Nebbia v. New York
Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Fifth Amendment case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ criminal procedure case ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 2004-03-22 ⓘ |
| citation | 542 U.S. 177 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2004-06-21 ⓘ |
| decisionType | precedential decision ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
David H. Souter
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED ⓘ Ruth Bader Ginsburg NERFINISHED ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 03-5554 ⓘ |
| fullName | Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding |
A state law requiring a suspect to disclose his or her name during a lawful investigatory stop does not, by itself, violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
ⓘ
States may require a suspect to disclose his or her name in the course of a valid Terry stop without violating the Fourth Amendment. ⓘ |
| impact | upheld constitutionality of state stop-and-identify laws under certain conditions ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Antonin Scalia
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED ⓘ Sandra Day O'Connor NERFINISHED ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED ⓘ William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| legalIssue |
Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in the context of compelled identification
ⓘ
constitutionality of stop-and-identify statutes ⓘ scope of Fourth Amendment protections during Terry stops ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| originatingState | Nevada NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| page | 177 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Larry Dudley Hiibel NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| policeActionAtIssue | officer's demand that a detained suspect state his name ⓘ |
| relatedCase | Terry v. Ohio NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine | Terry stop ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent |
Humboldt County, Nevada
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result | Nevada Supreme Court judgment affirmed ⓘ |
| statuteInvolved | Nevada stop-and-identify statute NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
criminal procedure
ⓘ
police powers ⓘ search and seizure ⓘ self-incrimination ⓘ |
| volume | 542 ⓘ |
| vote | 5-4 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2004 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Description of subject: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of state "stop and identify" laws requiring suspects to disclose their names during lawful Terry stops.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.