Triple

T12141893
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jeffrey L. Fisher E289203 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada E522189 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada | Statement: [Jeffrey L. Fisher, notableCase, Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
Context triple: [Jeffrey L. Fisher, notableCase, Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada]
  • A. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada chosen
    Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of state "stop and identify" laws requiring suspects to disclose their names during lawful Terry stops.
  • B. Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
    Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. Oregon v. Elstad
    Oregon v. Elstad is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a suspect’s later, properly Mirandized confession can be admissible even if an earlier unwarned statement was obtained in violation of Miranda.
  • D. Arizona v. Evans
    Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
  • E. Missouri v. Seibert
    Missouri v. Seibert is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited police use of "question-first, warn-later" interrogation tactics by strengthening Miranda protections for suspects.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d915a9838081909622cc14df2a2582 completed April 10, 2026, 3:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f5f692ee048190ab42c92296fd28fb completed May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.