Cook–Levin theorem
E512972
The Cook–Levin theorem is a foundational result in computational complexity theory that established the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) as the first NP-complete problem, launching the theory of NP-completeness.
All labels observed (5)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Cook–Levin theorem canonical | 4 |
| Boolean satisfiability problem | 1 |
| Cook’s 1971 NP-completeness paper | 1 |
| Cook’s theorem | 1 |
| SAT is NP-complete | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5335897 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Cook–Levin theorem Context triple: [P, NP, and NP-Completeness: The Basics of Complexity Theory, mainTopic, Cook–Levin theorem]
-
A.
Valiant–Vazirani theorem
The Valiant–Vazirani theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory showing that solving unique solutions of NP problems is, under randomized reductions, as hard as solving general NP problems, with major implications for the study of randomness and hardness of approximation.
-
B.
PCP theorem
The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
-
C.
P versus NP problem
The P versus NP problem is a central unsolved question in theoretical computer science that asks whether every problem whose solution can be quickly verified by a computer can also be quickly solved by a computer.
-
D.
Entscheidungsproblem
The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
-
E.
Håstad’s switching lemma
Håstad’s switching lemma is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory that provides powerful bounds on the simplification of Boolean formulas under random restrictions, with major applications in circuit lower bounds.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Cook–Levin theorem Target entity description: The Cook–Levin theorem is a foundational result in computational complexity theory that established the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) as the first NP-complete problem, launching the theory of NP-completeness.
-
A.
Valiant–Vazirani theorem
The Valiant–Vazirani theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory showing that solving unique solutions of NP problems is, under randomized reductions, as hard as solving general NP problems, with major implications for the study of randomness and hardness of approximation.
-
B.
PCP theorem
The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
-
C.
P versus NP problem
The P versus NP problem is a central unsolved question in theoretical computer science that asks whether every problem whose solution can be quickly verified by a computer can also be quickly solved by a computer.
-
D.
Entscheidungsproblem
The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
-
E.
Håstad’s switching lemma
Håstad’s switching lemma is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory that provides powerful bounds on the simplification of Boolean formulas under random restrictions, with major applications in circuit lower bounds.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
NP-completeness theorem
ⓘ
theorem in computational complexity theory ⓘ |
| appliesTo | decision version of Boolean satisfiability ⓘ |
| assumesModel | Turing machine model of computation ⓘ |
| complexityClassInvolved | NP NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| concernsComplexityMeasure | time complexity ⓘ |
| concernsDecisionProblems | yes ⓘ |
| coreIdea | simulate computation tableau of a nondeterministic Turing machine with a Boolean formula ⓘ |
| establishes |
Boolean satisfiability problem is NP-complete
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
SAT is NP-complete NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| field |
computational complexity theory
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
theoretical computer science ⓘ |
| firstNPCompleteProblem |
Boolean satisfiability problem
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
SAT NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| formalizes | encoding of nondeterministic Turing machine computations as SAT instances ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance | first formal NP-completeness result ⓘ |
| implies | every problem in NP is polynomial-time reducible to SAT ⓘ |
| importanceLevel | foundational in complexity theory ⓘ |
| independentlyProvedBy | Leonid Levin NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| influenced |
P versus NP problem research
ⓘ
development of complexity theory ⓘ |
| introducedConcept | NP-completeness ⓘ |
| isBasisFor | classification of many NP-complete problems ⓘ |
| language | mathematics of computation NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| launched | theory of NP-completeness NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| mainResult | Boolean satisfiability problem is NP-complete ⓘ |
| namedAfter |
Leonid Levin
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Stephen Cook NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| originallyProvedBy | Stephen Cook NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| originalPaperTitle | The Complexity of Theorem-Proving Procedures NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| problemDomain | decision problems over strings ⓘ |
| problemTypeInvolved |
Boolean satisfiability problem
ⓘ
SAT ⓘ |
| proofTechnique | polynomial-time encoding of computations into Boolean formulas ⓘ |
| publishedIn | Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
Boolean formula
ⓘ
NP-complete problem ⓘ P versus NP problem ⓘ nondeterministic Turing machine ⓘ polynomial-time reduction ⓘ |
| showsHardnessFor | all problems in NP ⓘ |
| showsSATIs |
NP-hard
ⓘ
in NP ⓘ |
| standardReferenceIn | NP-completeness textbooks ⓘ |
| status | proven ⓘ |
| usedToProve | NP-completeness of other problems via reductions from SAT ⓘ |
| usesReductionType | polynomial-time many-one reduction ⓘ |
| yearProved | 1971 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Cook–Levin theorem Description of subject: The Cook–Levin theorem is a foundational result in computational complexity theory that established the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) as the first NP-complete problem, launching the theory of NP-completeness.
Referenced by (8)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.