social choice theory
E496859
branch of welfare economics
field of study
subfield of economics
subfield of political science
theory
Social choice theory is a field of economics and political science that studies how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions or social welfare judgments.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| social choice theory canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5134896 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: social choice theory Context triple: [On Economic Inequality, fieldOfStudy, social choice theory]
-
A.
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
-
B.
Social Choice and Individual Values
Social Choice and Individual Values is a foundational 1951 book by economist Kenneth Arrow that established modern social choice theory and introduced Arrow’s impossibility theorem.
-
C.
Arrow’s impossibility theorem
Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
-
D.
Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem
The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a fundamental result in social choice theory showing that every reasonable voting system with at least three options is susceptible to strategic manipulation by voters.
-
E.
Condorcet paradox
The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: social choice theory Target entity description: Social choice theory is a field of economics and political science that studies how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions or social welfare judgments.
-
A.
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
-
B.
Social Choice and Individual Values
Social Choice and Individual Values is a foundational 1951 book by economist Kenneth Arrow that established modern social choice theory and introduced Arrow’s impossibility theorem.
-
C.
Arrow’s impossibility theorem
Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
-
D.
Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem
The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a fundamental result in social choice theory showing that every reasonable voting system with at least three options is susceptible to strategic manipulation by voters.
-
E.
Condorcet paradox
The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
branch of welfare economics
ⓘ
field of study ⓘ subfield of economics ⓘ subfield of political science ⓘ theory ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
committee decisions
ⓘ
elections ⓘ public decision making ⓘ public policy design ⓘ resource allocation ⓘ |
| developedBy |
Allan Gibbard
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Amartya Sen NERFINISHED ⓘ Duncan Black NERFINISHED ⓘ Hervé Moulin NERFINISHED ⓘ John Harsanyi NERFINISHED ⓘ Kenneth Arrow NERFINISHED ⓘ Mark Satterthwaite NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasGoal |
analysis of consistency of social choices
ⓘ
design of fair collective decision rules ⓘ reconciliation of individual and collective rationality ⓘ |
| hasKeyConcept |
Arrow's impossibility theorem
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Borda count NERFINISHED ⓘ Condorcet method NERFINISHED ⓘ Condorcet paradox NERFINISHED ⓘ Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem NERFINISHED ⓘ Pareto efficiency NERFINISHED ⓘ anonymity ⓘ dictatorship ⓘ fairness axioms ⓘ independence of irrelevant alternatives ⓘ majority rule ⓘ monotonicity ⓘ neutrality ⓘ non-dictatorship ⓘ single-peaked preferences ⓘ social choice function ⓘ social welfare function ⓘ strategy-proof mechanism ⓘ transitivity ⓘ unrestricted domain ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
game theory
ⓘ
mechanism design theory ⓘ political philosophy ⓘ welfare economics ⓘ |
| studies |
aggregation of individual preferences
ⓘ
collective decision making ⓘ collective rationality ⓘ fair division ⓘ impossibility theorems ⓘ interpersonal comparisons of welfare ⓘ judgment aggregation ⓘ manipulability of voting rules ⓘ mechanism design ⓘ preference aggregation rules ⓘ social choice functions ⓘ social welfare functions ⓘ social welfare judgments ⓘ strategy-proofness ⓘ voting systems ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: social choice theory Description of subject: Social choice theory is a field of economics and political science that studies how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions or social welfare judgments.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.