Triple

T15816942
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject capability approach E383503 entity
Predicate influencedBy P9 FINISHED
Object social choice theory E496859 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: social choice theory | Statement: [capability approach, influencedBy, social choice theory]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: social choice theory
Context triple: [capability approach, influencedBy, social choice theory]
  • A. social choice theory chosen
    Social choice theory is a field of economics and political science that studies how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions or social welfare judgments.
  • B. Collective Choice and Social Welfare
    Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
  • C. Social Choice and Individual Values
    Social Choice and Individual Values is a foundational 1951 book by economist Kenneth Arrow that established modern social choice theory and introduced Arrow’s impossibility theorem.
  • D. Arrow’s impossibility theorem
    Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
  • E. Condorcet jury theorem
    The Condorcet jury theorem is a result in probability theory and social choice stating that, under certain conditions, the likelihood that a majority vote yields the correct decision increases as the size of the voting group grows.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0c4a306a48190840adc49df2c26c5 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ff99959f048190ae24a072387ec233 completed May 9, 2026, 8:31 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.