Triple
T20364042
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | social choice theory |
E496859
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeyConcept |
P533
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Borda count |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Borda count | Statement: [social choice theory, hasKeyConcept, Borda count]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Borda count Context triple: [social choice theory, hasKeyConcept, Borda count]
-
A.
Borda count
chosen
The Borda count is a ranked voting method in which voters order candidates and points are assigned based on position in each ranking, with the candidate having the highest total score winning.
-
B.
Kemeny–Young method
The Kemeny–Young method is a voting system that ranks candidates by finding the ordering that best reflects voters’ pairwise preferences, minimizing overall disagreement.
-
C.
Sainte-Laguë method
The Sainte-Laguë method is a highest-averages system of party-list proportional representation that allocates seats more evenly between large and small parties than the d’Hondt method.
-
D.
Condorcet criterion
The Condorcet criterion is a voting system standard requiring that if a candidate would win every head-to-head contest against each other candidate, that candidate must be the overall election winner.
-
E.
instant-runoff voting
Instant-runoff voting is a ranked-choice electoral system in which voters order candidates by preference and votes are redistributed from the lowest-ranked candidates until one achieves a majority.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a4f9b081908a5a021919c21ccb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6786fd0088190908187ab642344cc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:26 a.m.