Eddie C. Thomas
E359880
Eddie C. Thomas is the claimant whose religious-objection unemployment benefits dispute reached the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Eddie C. Thomas canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3201301 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eddie C. Thomas Context triple: [Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, petitioner, Eddie C. Thomas]
-
A.
Elbert D. Thomas
Elbert D. Thomas was an American educator and Democratic U.S. Senator from Utah who served from 1933 to 1951 and was known for his work on foreign policy and education.
-
B.
Holton D. Robinson
Holton D. Robinson was an American civil engineer noted for his work on major suspension bridges in the early 20th century.
-
C.
Horace Albert McKinney
Horace Albert "Bones" McKinney was an American basketball player and coach best known for his colorful personality and successful coaching career at Wake Forest University.
-
D.
Herschel Daugherty
Herschel Daugherty was an American film and television director best known for his prolific work in mid-20th-century TV dramas and anthology series.
-
E.
Edwin Davis
Edwin Davis is an author best known for writing the work that inspired the film "All of Me."
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Eddie C. Thomas Target entity description: Eddie C. Thomas is the claimant whose religious-objection unemployment benefits dispute reached the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division.
-
A.
Elbert D. Thomas
Elbert D. Thomas was an American educator and Democratic U.S. Senator from Utah who served from 1933 to 1951 and was known for his work on foreign policy and education.
-
B.
Holton D. Robinson
Holton D. Robinson was an American civil engineer noted for his work on major suspension bridges in the early 20th century.
-
C.
Horace Albert McKinney
Horace Albert "Bones" McKinney was an American basketball player and coach best known for his colorful personality and successful coaching career at Wake Forest University.
-
D.
Herschel Daugherty
Herschel Daugherty was an American film and television director best known for his prolific work in mid-20th-century TV dramas and anthology series.
-
E.
Edwin Davis
Edwin Davis is an author best known for writing the work that inspired the film "All of Me."
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (32)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | person ⓘ |
| associatedWithTopic |
conscientious objection
ⓘ
religious freedom in the workplace ⓘ unemployment insurance law in the United States ⓘ |
| caseCitation |
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
ⓘ
surface form:
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 450 U.S. 707 (1981)
|
| caseDecisionYear | 1981 ⓘ |
| caseHeardBy | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvolved | First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| constitutionalRightInvolved | Free Exercise Clause ⓘ |
| countryOfCitizenship | United States of America ⓘ |
| employmentConsequence |
denied unemployment compensation
ⓘ
resigned from job due to religious beliefs ⓘ |
| filedAppealWith |
Indiana Department of Workforce Development
ⓘ
surface form:
Indiana Employment Security Division
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division ⓘ
surface form:
Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
surface form:
U.S. Supreme Court
|
| hasFamilyName | Thomas ⓘ |
| hasGivenName | Eddie ⓘ |
| holdingEffect | state may not deny unemployment benefits based on sincere religious objection to work ⓘ |
| jurisdictionOfCase | Indiana ⓘ |
| legalActionAgainst |
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
ⓘ
surface form:
Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
|
| legalIssue |
free exercise of religion
ⓘ
religious objection to work assignment ⓘ unemployment benefits ⓘ |
| legalPrecedentFor | claims of unemployment benefits denial based on religious objections to work assignments ⓘ |
| mentionedIn | U.S. Supreme Court opinion 450 U.S. 707 ⓘ |
| notableFor | religious-objection unemployment benefits dispute ⓘ |
| partyTo | Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division ⓘ |
| religiousBelief |
JehovahsWitnesses
ⓘ
surface form:
Jehovah's Witness
|
| roleInLawsuit |
claimant
ⓘ
petitioner ⓘ |
| supremeCourtOutcome | prevailed at the U.S. Supreme Court ⓘ |
| workplaceObjection | production of armaments ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Eddie C. Thomas Description of subject: Eddie C. Thomas is the claimant whose religious-objection unemployment benefits dispute reached the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.