Triple

T14896147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eddie C. Thomas E359880 entity
Predicate partyTo P1790 FINISHED
Object Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division E67057 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division | Statement: [Eddie C. Thomas, partyTo, Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
Context triple: [Eddie C. Thomas, partyTo, Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division]
  • A. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division chosen
    Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied strict scrutiny to a denial of unemployment benefits based on an individual’s religiously motivated refusal to perform certain work, reinforcing robust protections for free exercise of religion.
  • B. Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
    Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who refused Sunday work for sincere religious reasons, even though he was not a member of an organized religion.
  • C. Timbs v. Indiana
    Timbs v. Indiana is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • D. Hammon v. Indiana
    Hammon v. Indiana is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the Confrontation Clause by distinguishing between testimonial and non-testimonial statements in the context of domestic violence and police interrogations.
  • E. Hess v. Indiana
    Hess v. Indiana is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of the First Amendment's "incitement" exception by holding that an antiwar protester's vulgar statement advocating future lawless action was protected speech.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d827980cbc8190a0c569ae3940a1d9 completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ded6070b248190be8f4f91a0c0b1f3 completed April 15, 2026, 12:04 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fe6b679fb081908cf8f41acfba3b99 completed May 8, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 2:10 a.m.