Stone v. Mississippi

E330552

Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Stone v. Mississippi canonical 2

Statements (42)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 19th-century court case
United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
legal case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
contract law
state police power
branchOfGovernment judicial branch of the United States
citation 101 U.S. 814
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution
surface form: Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution

Contract Clause
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1880
decisionType majority opinion
defendant State of Mississippi
fullCaseName Stone v. Mississippi self-link
holding A state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power.
Mississippi could prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
The Contract Clause does not prevent a state from exercising its police power to suppress lotteries.
impact limited the ability of private parties to rely on state contracts that restrict future exercises of police power.
jurisdiction federal
language English
legalIssue Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution
surface form: Contract Clause of the United States Constitution

scope of state police power
validity of lottery charter
pageInUnitedStatesReports 814
plaintiff Stone
principleEstablished Police power is a continuing power that cannot be contracted away.
State legislatures cannot bargain away or irrepealably surrender essential attributes of sovereignty.
relatedConcept Contract Clause jurisprudence
police power
state regulation of gambling
result Mississippi's prohibition of the lottery was upheld.
stateInvolved Mississippi
subjectMatter lottery regulation
state regulatory authority
timePeriod Reconstruction era
topic lotteries
public morals regulation
state sovereignty
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 101

How these facts were elicited

The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.

Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10.

# Requirements
- If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list.
- If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list.
- Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf".
- Do not get too wordy.
- Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Stone v. Mississippi
Description of subject: Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite presidedOver Stone v. Mississippi
subject surface form: Morrison R. Waite
Stone v. Mississippi fullCaseName Stone v. Mississippi self-link