LeRoy Shelton

E289605

LeRoy Shelton is the criminal defendant whose case led to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Alabama v. Shelton, which held that a suspended sentence cannot be imposed without providing the defendant access to counsel.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
LeRoy Shelton canonical 1

Statements (25)

Predicate Object
instanceOf criminal defendant
person
affectedLegalDoctrine right to counsel in misdemeanor cases
use of uncounseled convictions to impose imprisonment
caseCitation Alabama v. Shelton
surface form: Alabama v. Shelton, 535 U.S. 654 (2002)
caseDecisionYear 2002
caseHoldingRelatedTo imposition of suspended or probationary sentences
indigent defendants
uncounseled convictions
caseOutcomeEffect suspended sentence cannot be imposed without providing the defendant access to counsel
caseResultForDefendant Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment
chargedIn Alabama
surface form: State of Alabama
constitutionalProvisionInvolved Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
surface form: Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
countryOfLegalProceedings United States of America
surface form: United States
hasLegalRepresentationIssue was not provided counsel before receiving a suspended sentence
jurisdictionOfCase Supreme Court of the United States
surface form: United States Supreme Court
legalIssueInCase Sixth Amendment right to counsel
right to counsel
suspended sentence
legalSignificance his case established that a suspended sentence triggering imprisonment cannot be imposed without counsel
notableFor being the defendant in Alabama v. Shelton
partyToCase Alabama v. Shelton
roleInCase petitioner
stateOfLegalProceedings Alabama

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Alabama v. Shelton hasRespondent LeRoy Shelton