Triple

T12157281
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject LeRoy Shelton E289605 entity
Predicate affectedLegalDoctrine P90230 FINISHED
Object right to counsel in misdemeanor cases LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: right to counsel in misdemeanor cases | Statement: [LeRoy Shelton, affectedLegalDoctrine, right to counsel in misdemeanor cases]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affectedLegalDoctrine
Context triple: [LeRoy Shelton, affectedLegalDoctrine, right to counsel in misdemeanor cases]
  • A. legalDoctrineInfluenced
    Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
  • B. legalDoctrine
    Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
  • C. involvedInLegalDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that an entity plays a role in the formation, interpretation, application, or development of a particular legal doctrine.
  • D. legalDoctrineChallenged
    Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
  • E. relatedLegalSystem
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d915d7109481908bf5fe512bba3c89 completed April 10, 2026, 3:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9150c18148190bf8152189c0e5fca completed April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.