Ex parte Merryman

E276818

Ex parte Merryman was an 1861 U.S. federal court case in which Chief Justice Roger B. Taney challenged President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (2)

Statements (41)

Predicate Object
instanceOf American Civil War legal case
United States federal court case
habeas corpus case
branchChallenged executive branch
chiefJustice Roger Brooke Taney
surface form: Roger B. Taney
citationStyle Ex parte Merryman self-linksurface differs
surface form: Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (C.C.D. Md. 1861)
concerns suspension of the writ of habeas corpus
constitutionalProvision Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
surface form: Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court United States Circuit Court for the District of Maryland
date 1861
hasJurisdiction U.S. federal courts
surface form: United States federal courts
held that the President lacked unilateral authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus
that the power to suspend habeas corpus lies with Congress, not the President
historicalContext Union military arrests of suspected Confederate sympathizers in Maryland
involves Abraham Lincoln
isOftenCitedIn discussions of civil liberties in wartime
scholarship on separation of powers
isOftenComparedTo Ex parte Milligan
Korematsu v. United States
judgeAuthoredOpinion Roger Brooke Taney
surface form: Roger B. Taney
legalIssue civil liberties during wartime
presidential power to suspend habeas corpus
separation of powers
location Maryland
petitioner John Merryman
presidentInvolved Abraham Lincoln
presidingJudge Roger Brooke Taney
surface form: Roger B. Taney
relatedTo Abraham Lincoln’s April 27, 1861 suspension of habeas corpus
Suspension Clause
surface form: Suspension Clause of the United States Constitution
respondent United States government
result executive branch refused to comply with the court’s order
order to release John Merryman from military custody
significance early and prominent challenge to presidential war powers
important precedent in debates over emergency powers
landmark in the history of habeas corpus in the United States
status never reviewed by the United States Supreme Court as a full Court
subjectMatter limits on martial law
military detention of civilians
tookPlaceDuring American Civil War
year 1861

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Roger B. Taney Court notableCase Ex parte Merryman
Roger Brooke Taney notableCourtCase Ex parte Merryman
Taney Court hasNotableDecision Ex parte Merryman
Ex parte Merryman citationStyle Ex parte Merryman self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (C.C.D. Md. 1861)