New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

E166646

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan canonical 3

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
defamation case
landmark First Amendment case
appliesTo public officials
arguedDate 1964-01-06
citation 376 U.S. 254
concurrenceBy Arthur J. Goldberg
Hugo L. Black
William O. Douglas
constitutionalProvisionAppliedThrough Fourteenth Amendment
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1964-03-09
definedTerm actual malice is knowledge that a statement was false or reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.
effect made it harder for public officials to win libel suits in the United States
establishedStandard actual malice
expandedProtectionFor press
speech criticizing public officials
holding A public official cannot recover damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to official conduct unless the official proves the statement was made with actual malice.
The First Amendment limits a state’s power to award damages in libel actions brought by public officials against critics of their official conduct.
involvedAdvertisement Heed Their Rising Voices
involvedPublication The New York Times
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White
Earl Warren
Hugo L. Black
John M. Harlan II
Potter Stewart
Tom C. Clark
William O. Douglas
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
laterExtendedTo public figures
legalSubject First Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form: First Amendment

constitutional law
defamation law
freedom of the press
majorityOpinionBy William J. Brennan Jr.
originatingCourt Supreme Court of Alabama
page 254
petitioner The New York Times Company
rearguedDate 1964-01-07
recognizedPrinciple debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.
relatedTo civil rights movement
criticism of police conduct in Montgomery, Alabama
reporter United States Reports
respondent L. B. Sullivan
stateLawAtIssue Alabama libel law
volume 376
yearDecided 1964

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Brennan notableWork New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
subject surface form: William J. Brennan Jr.
United States Supreme Court cases hasPart New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Warren Court era notableCase New York Times Co. v. Sullivan