Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
E1586
The Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s influential Supreme Court opinion criticizing restrictive limits on pay discrimination claims and helping spur the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
All labels observed (4)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T15428 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent Context triple: [Ruth Bader Ginsburg, notableWork, Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent]
-
A.
Helvering v. Davis
Helvering v. Davis is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and broadly affirmed federal power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
-
B.
Brandeis/Roberts
Brandeis/Roberts is a commuter rail station in Waltham, Massachusetts, serving Brandeis University and the surrounding residential area.
-
C.
Notorious RBG
Notorious RBG is the popular cultural nickname for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, celebrating her as a trailblazing feminist icon and champion of gender equality.
-
D.
All Hail to Massachusetts
"All Hail to Massachusetts" is the official state song that celebrates the history, pride, and heritage of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
-
E.
The Protester
The Protester is the collective title Time magazine gave in 2011 to individuals worldwide who participated in mass demonstrations and uprisings, symbolizing the power of grassroots activism in shaping global events.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent Target entity description: The Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s influential Supreme Court opinion criticizing restrictive limits on pay discrimination claims and helping spur the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
-
A.
Helvering v. Davis
Helvering v. Davis is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and broadly affirmed federal power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
-
B.
Brandeis/Roberts
Brandeis/Roberts is a commuter rail station in Waltham, Massachusetts, serving Brandeis University and the surrounding residential area.
-
C.
Notorious RBG
Notorious RBG is the popular cultural nickname for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, celebrating her as a trailblazing feminist icon and champion of gender equality.
-
D.
All Hail to Massachusetts
"All Hail to Massachusetts" is the official state song that celebrates the history, pride, and heritage of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
-
E.
The Protester
The Protester is the collective title Time magazine gave in 2011 to individuals worldwide who participated in mass demonstrations and uprisings, symbolizing the power of grassroots activism in shaping global events.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | United States Supreme Court judicial opinion ⓘ |
| addresses |
gender-based pay discrimination
ⓘ
systemic workplace discrimination ⓘ |
| advocatesFor | broad construction of remedial civil rights statutes ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
employment discrimination law ⓘ |
| argues | each discriminatory paycheck should be treated as a separate unlawful employment practice ⓘ |
| authoredBy | Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ |
| callsFor | Congressional action to correct the Court’s interpretation ⓘ |
| caseCitation | 550 U.S. 618 ⓘ |
| characterizesMajority | unduly cramped reading of Title VII ⓘ |
| cites |
Title VII’s remedial purpose
ⓘ
prior Supreme Court discrimination precedents ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | majority opinion by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| criticizes |
formalistic approach to filing deadlines in discrimination cases
ⓘ
restrictive interpretation of Title VII’s charge-filing period ⓘ |
| date | 2007 ⓘ |
| emphasizes |
difficulty employees face in discovering pay discrimination
ⓘ
workplace pay secrecy and lack of salary transparency ⓘ |
| focusesOn | pay discrimination that accumulates over time ⓘ |
| hasAuthorRole | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| highlights |
cumulative effect of discriminatory pay decisions over a career
ⓘ
economic harm to women from long-term pay disparities ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance | catalyst for statutory reversal of a Supreme Court decision on limitations for pay discrimination claims ⓘ |
| influenced |
Lilly Ledbetter
ⓘ
surface form:
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009
|
| interprets | 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1) ⓘ |
| joinedBy |
David H. Souter
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal law ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
ⓘ
pay discrimination ⓘ statute of limitations for discrimination claims ⓘ |
| notableFor |
explicit invitation to Congress to amend the law
ⓘ
use in legislative history of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act ⓘ |
| opinionType | dissenting opinion ⓘ |
| partOf |
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007)
|
| policyImpact | expansion of time period for filing pay discrimination claims ⓘ |
| positionOnLimitationsPeriod | charge-filing period should run from each discriminatory paycheck ⓘ |
| references |
Congressional intent behind Title VII
ⓘ
precedent on continuing violations in discrimination law ⓘ |
| supportsParty | Lilly Ledbetter ⓘ |
| usedAs | authority in debates over pay equity legislation ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent Description of subject: The Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s influential Supreme Court opinion criticizing restrictive limits on pay discrimination claims and helping spur the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
→
partOf
→
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007)
this entity surface form:
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
biographical book "Grace and Grit"
→
focusesOn
→
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) dissent
ⓘ
subject surface form:
Grace and Grit
this entity surface form:
United States Supreme Court case Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.