von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory

E15613

Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory is an axiomatic set theory extending Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory by formally distinguishing between sets and classes, widely used in foundational studies of mathematics.


Statements (50)
Predicate Object
instanceOf axiomatic set theory
conservative extension of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
set theory
two-sorted first-order theory
allows quantification over sets
distinguishesBetween classes
sets
extends Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
formalizes talk about proper classes such as the class of all sets
hasAbbreviation von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
surface form: "NBG"
hasAlternativeName von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
surface form: "NBG set theory"

von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
surface form: "von Neumann–Gödel–Bernays set theory"
hasAxiom axiom of choice (for sets)
axiom of empty set
axiom of extensionality
axiom of foundation
axiom of infinity
axiom of pairing
axiom of replacement (for sets)
axiom of union
axiom schema of class comprehension (restricted)
hasFeature all sets are classes but not conversely
conservative over ZF for set-theoretic statements
finite axiomatizability (with global choice)
proper classes cannot be members of any class
treats classes as first-order objects
hasHistoricalOrigin von Neumann's work on axiomatizing set theory in the 1920s
hasKeyConcept definable classes
global choice
proper class
set-class distinction
hasLanguage first-order language with membership and class predicates
hasSort class
set
hasVariant NBG with global choice
NBG without global choice
isConservativeOver Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
isEquiconsistentWith Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
surface form: "Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice"
isRelatedTo Morse–Kelley set theory by class–set distinction
surface form: "Morse–Kelley set theory"
isUsedIn axiomatic set theory
category theory foundations
class theory
foundations of mathematics
isWeakerThan Morse–Kelley set theory by class–set distinction
surface form: "Morse–Kelley set theory (in proof-theoretic strength)"
restricts quantification over classes to formulas without class quantifiers (in standard formulation)
wasDevelopedBy John von Neumann
Kurt Gödel
Paul Bernays
wasFurtherDevelopedBy Kurt Gödel in the 1940s
wasRefinedBy Paul Bernays in the 1930s

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Grothendieck universe alternativeTo von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
Cantor’s paradox avoidedIn von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory hasAbbreviation von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "NBG"
von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory hasAlternativeName von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "von Neumann–Gödel–Bernays set theory"
von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory hasAlternativeName von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "NBG set theory"
set theory hasAxiomSystem von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
Morse–Kelley set theory by class–set distinction isRelatedTo von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel class theory"
Morse–Kelley set theory by class–set distinction isStrongerThan von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
John von Neumann notableConcept von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
Burali-Forti paradox resolvedIn von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory by treating the collection of all ordinals as a proper class"
Burali-Forti paradox resolvedIn von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
this entity surface form: "von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory by class–set distinction"

Please wait…