Cantor’s paradox

E14593

Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.

Aliases (1)

Statements (42)
Predicate Object
instanceOf logical paradox
result in set theory
set-theoretic paradox
assumes existence of a set of all sets
avoidedIn Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
clarifies distinction between sets and proper classes
concerns hierarchy of infinities
infinite sets
conclusion naive set theory with unrestricted comprehension is inconsistent
no set can contain all sets as elements
contradicts existence of a maximal cardinality
derives contradiction in cardinalities
field mathematical logic
set theory
formalizes impossibility of a set of all cardinalities
hasKeyIdea self-application of Cantor’s theorem to a supposed universal set
hasProofMethod cardinality comparison
diagonalization
historicalPeriod late 19th century
holdsIn naive set theory
implies collection of all sets must be a proper class in axiomatic set theory
universe of sets is not itself a set
influenced Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
axiom of separation
axiom schema of replacement
isDiscussedIn foundations of mathematics
philosophy of mathematics
mainClaim the set of all sets cannot exist
there is no universal set in standard set theory
motivated development of axiomatic set theory
namedAfter Georg Cantor
relatedTo Burali-Forti paradox
Russell’s paradox
proper class
universal set
shows a universal set would have cardinality strictly less than its power set and equal to it
power set of any set has strictly greater cardinality than the set
usesConcept Cantor’s theorem
cardinality
diagonal argument
power set

Referenced by (3)
Subject (surface form when different) Predicate
Burali-Forti paradox ("Cantor paradox")
Cantor’s theorem
Russell’s paradox
relatedTo

Please wait…