Cantor’s theorem
E78328
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
Observed surface forms (1)
| Surface form | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Cantor’s diagonal argument | 1 |
Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
mathematical theorem
ⓘ
result in set theory ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
every set
ⓘ
finite sets ⓘ infinite sets ⓘ |
| consequence |
for any infinite cardinal κ, 2^κ > κ
ⓘ
hierarchy of ever-larger infinities ⓘ no set is equinumerous with its power set ⓘ |
| coreConcept |
cardinality
ⓘ
infinite sets ⓘ power set ⓘ uncountability ⓘ |
| domain | foundations of mathematics ⓘ |
| field | set theory ⓘ |
| formalExpression |
∀S (|S| < |P(S)|)
ⓘ
∀S ¬∃f : S → P(S) such that f is surjective ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | late 19th century ⓘ |
| holdsIn |
ZF
ⓘ
surface form:
ZFC
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory ⓘ most standard axiomatic set theories ⓘ |
| implies |
the existence of infinitely many distinct infinite cardinalities
ⓘ
the real numbers are uncountable ⓘ the set of all subsets of the natural numbers is uncountable ⓘ there is no largest cardinal number ⓘ there is no largest infinity ⓘ |
| importance |
fundamental result in set theory
ⓘ
key to understanding different sizes of infinity ⓘ |
| influenced |
development of modern set theory
ⓘ
philosophy of mathematics ⓘ |
| isPartOf |
the study of cardinal numbers
ⓘ
the theory of infinite sets ⓘ |
| namedAfter | Georg Cantor ⓘ |
| proofIdea | assume a surjection from S to P(S) and derive a contradiction using a specially constructed subset ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Cantor’s theorem
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Cantor’s diagonal argument
Cantor’s paradox ⓘ cardinal arithmetic ⓘ continuum hypothesis ⓘ |
| states |
for any set S, the power set P(S) has strictly greater cardinality than S
ⓘ
for every set S, |S| < |P(S)| ⓘ there is no surjection from a set S onto its power set P(S) ⓘ |
| status | proven ⓘ |
| usesMethod |
diagonal argument
ⓘ
proof by contradiction ⓘ |
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Cantor’s diagonal argument