Hesychast controversy

E129552

The Hesychast controversy was a 14th-century theological and mystical dispute within the Eastern Orthodox Church over the nature of divine light and the practice of contemplative prayer, most notably associated with Gregory Palamas.

All labels observed (3)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 14th-century event ⓘ
Eastern Orthodox theological dispute ⓘ
mystical dispute ⓘ
religious controversy ⓘ
theological controversy ⓘ
concerns distinction between essence and energies of God ⓘ
nature of divine light ⓘ
possibility of experiencing God directly ⓘ
validity of Hesychast prayer practices ⓘ
endTime 1350s ⓘ
hasAspect debate over apophatic theology ⓘ
debate over uncreated vs created light ⓘ
debate over use of philosophy in theology ⓘ
hasPart Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
Council of Constantinople 1347 ⓘ
Council of Constantinople 1351 ⓘ
hasParticipant Barlaam of Calabria ⓘ
Andronikos III Palaiologos ⓘ
surface form: Emperor Andronikos III Palaiologos

John VI Kantakouzenos ⓘ
surface form: Emperor John VI Kantakouzenos

Gregory Akindynos ⓘ
St. Gregory Palamas ⓘ
surface form: Gregory Palamas

Patriarch John XIV Kalekas ⓘ
historicalContext Late Byzantine period ⓘ
surface form: late Byzantine Empire
influenced Byzantine theology ⓘ
Palamism ⓘ
later Eastern Orthodox spirituality ⓘ
involvesPractice Jesus Prayer ⓘ
bodily techniques in prayer ⓘ
inner stillness ⓘ
keyFigureRole Barlaam of Calabria as critic of Hesychasm ⓘ
Gregory Palamas as chief defender of Hesychasm ⓘ
languageOfDiscussion Greek ⓘ
location Byzantine Empire ⓘ
Constantinople (probable) ⓘ
surface form: Constantinople

Mount Athos ⓘ
mainTopic Hesychasm ⓘ
contemplative prayer ⓘ
divine light ⓘ
uncreated light ⓘ
opposedView Barlaamite criticism of Hesychasm ⓘ
outcomeDocument Tomos of 1351 ⓘ
relatedTo Byzantine civil war of 1341–1347 ⓘ
religiousTradition Eastern Orthodox Christianity ⓘ
surface form: Eastern Orthodoxy
result affirmation of Hesychast spirituality ⓘ
condemnation of Barlaam’s teachings ⓘ
dogmatic formulation of essence–energies distinction ⓘ
vindication of Gregory Palamas ⓘ
startTime 1330s ⓘ
supportedView Palamite defense of Hesychasm ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (7)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

St. Gregory Palamas → participantIn → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
subject surface form: Gregory Palamas
hesychast tradition → controversy → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
St. → subjectOf → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
subject surface form: St. Gregory Palamas
this entity surface form: Palamite controversy
Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts → historicalPeriod → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
this entity surface form: Byzantine Hesychast controversy
Homilies → historicalContext → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
this entity surface form: Palamite controversy
Gregory Akindynos → controversy → Hesychast controversy ⓘ
this entity surface form: Palamite controversy
Palamite councils of Constantinople → seeAlso → Hesychast controversy ⓘ